Neural
Sensitization By Dr Martin Pall
Neural Sensitization
Neural
sensitization occurs by activation of brain and nerve cell N-methyl-D-aspartate(NMDA),
which then increases brain nitric oxide (NO).1,2,3 Several vicious
biochemical cycles are then set in motion.
Nitric oxide forms a tissue damaging free radical known as peroxynitrite.2,4,5,6
Peroxynitrite depletes energy TP,7,8 which then
further increases the sensitization of NMDA. 9,10
Chemical
exposure can induce sensitization. Pesticides
such as organophosphates inhibit acetylcholine, acitivating muscarinic
receptors, which increase nitric oxide. Formaldehyde
activates NMDA.1,11
Petrochemicals
(VOC’s, solvents) disrupt energy production in the nitochondria, increase
super oxide which increases peroxynitrite.12 This can then increase
tissue-damaging free radicals in the brain.13 Mitochondrial
disruption occurs in chemically injured patients.14 Petrochemicals
and many other chemicals are irritants15 that with exposure can cause
inflammation. Inflammation of
sufficient duration can lead to chronic neurogenic inflammation.16
Inflammation results in increased cytokines, free radicals and elevated nitric
oxide.
Neural
sensitization is thus associated with self-perpetuating neuroexcitation and
excessive response to further chemical exposure.11,17
This NMDA activation with increased nitric oxide and peroxynitrite can
cause brain cell death and neurogenerative disease.2,6,10,18,19,20
Peroxynitrite also weakens the blood-brain barrier, allowing chemicals to
enter the brain more readily.21
Nitric oxide also damages the first detoxification step involving the
cytochrome p450 system,22 allowing chemicals (and many drugs) to
build up more in the body.
This
vicious cycle MUST therefore be interrupted to the maximum extent feasible.
Because the resulting symptoms of sensitization are warnings that other
more silent toxic-induced organ damage of the liver, pancreas, immune system,
adrenals, mitochondria and other organs can be also occurring,16,23,24
masking/blocking
symptoms of this cycle is not recommended without healing the disturbed
biochemical mechanism. (This would
be like turning off a battery warning light without fixing the battery.)
Cobalamine(B12) is a nitric oxide scavenger and deficient in the majority
of chemically ill patients. The
cyano form is not recommended (these patients don’t need cyanide and the
hydroxy and methyl forms work much better in the brain and nerve cells).
Superoxide dismutase is deficient in a significant portion of chemically ill
patients and its cofactors, copper, zinc, and manganese must be adequate.
These are often reduced in chemically injured patients and should be
tested and replaced in well-absorbed and transported forms, for example,
picolinates. Antioxidant function
is usually inadequate in chemically ill patients,23 and increased lipid peroxides and other free radicals are
common.
Intervention
to help reduce this vicious biochemical cycle includes: methyl or
hydroxycobalamine sublingually or I.M. (not oral due to poor absorption),
general antioxidants (C, E, selenium), glutathione by nebulizer due to poor oral
absorption, and ample alpha lipoic acid to reactivate the glutathione in the
many damaged lipid tissues (cell membranes, mitochondria, lymph, brain, etc,).
Trimethyl glycine is recommended as a methyl donor to reduce the effects
of peroxynitrite. Magnesiuim should
be ample because deficiency is very common with toxic injury and adequate
magnesium decreases NMDA activiation. Peroxynitrite
scavengers such as a mixture of caretenoids are also recommended.
Carentenoids tend to be more organ-specific. An inclusion of gingko (brain), silimarin (liver), bilberry
(collagen stabilizing, capillary permeability, vision), cranberry (urinary) and
other mixed caretenoids is recommended.
Mineral
levels should be measured and followed by intercellular (eg.RBC) or lipid
functional (eg. Lymphocyte mitogenesis, a SpectraCell technology). Functional lymphocyte evaluaion and follow-up of glutathione,
lipoic acid, total antioxidant function, C, E and zinc is also recommended. At
this time this technology is only available through Spectra cell laboratory.
None
of the above is a substitute for exposure controls at home, work and /or places
where the person spends most of their time.
Humans are social beings, and these measures above gradually increase the
person’s ability to enjoy the company of others and use public places. When society is adequately informed and takes public health
accommodation measures to reduce irritants and toxins in personal products and
public places, this further promotes health and reduces sensitization.
Solvents, Voc’s
Pesticides (OP,carbamates)
Formaldehyde
NMDA
Nitric Oxide
Inflammation,
Tissue injury
Superoxide
Neural
Peroxynitrite
Sensitization
__________________________
1JE
Haley etal., “Evidence for spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor involvement in
prolonged chemical nociception in a rat”. Brain Res518:218-226,1990.
2M
Lafon-Cazal etal., “Nitric oxide, superoxide and peroxynitrite: putative
mediation of NMDA-induced cell death in cerebellar cells”, Neuropharmacology
32:1259-1266,1999.
3IJ
Reynolds and TG Hastings, “Glutamate produces production of reactive oxygen
species in cultured forebrain neurons following NMDA receptor activation”,
J.Neurosci 15:3318-3327,1995.
4JS
Beckman, “The double edged role of nitric oxide in brain function and
superoxide-mediated injury”, J.Dev Physiol15:53-59, 1991.
5M
Lafon-Cazal etal., “NMDA-dependent superoxide production and Neurotoxicity”,
Nature 364:535-537, 1993.
6JT
Coyle and P Puttfarken, “Oxidative stress, glutamate and neuro generative
disorders”, Science262:689-659,1993.
7JS
Beckman and JP Crow, “Pathologic implications of nitric oxide,superoxide and
peroxynitrite formation”, Biochem Soc Trans21:330-333,1993
8WA
Pryor and GL Squadrito, “The chemistry of peroxynitirte: a product of the
reaction of nitric oxide and superoxide:, Am J.Physiol268:L699-L722,1995.
9A
Novelli etal., “Glutamate becomes neurotoxic via the NMDA receptor when
intercellular energy levels become reduced”, Brain Res451:205-212,1988.
10JB
Schultz, etal., “The role of mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal nitric
oxide in animal models of neurodegenative diseases”, Mol Cell Biochem
174:171-184,1997.
11SB
MaMahon etal., “Central excitability triggered by noxious inputs”, Current
Opin Neurobiol 3:602-610,1993.
12TR
Garbe and H Yukama, “Common solvent toxicity: auto oxidation of respiratory
redox-cyclers enforced by membrane derangement”, Z Natur forsch
56:483-491,2001.
13CJ
Mattia etal., “Toluene-induced oxidative stress in several brain regions and
other organs”, MolChem Neurophysiol 18:313-328,1993.
14GE
Ziem, “Profile of Patients with Chemical Injury and Sensitivity”, Env Health
Persp105:Supp 2:417-436, 1997.
15RE
Lenga, Ed.,Sigma-Aldrich Library of Chemical Safety Data. Sigma-Aldrich
Corp,1988.
16GE
Ziem, “Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Chemicals Injury and
Sensitivity” presented to a conference sponsored by the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences, August 2001.
17WD
Willis, “Role of neurotransmitters in sensitization of pain responses”, Ann
NY Acad Sci 933:175-184,2001.
18A
Doble, “NMDA and neurogenative conditions (reviews)”, Pharmacol Ther
81:163-221,1999.
19VL
Dawson and TM Dawson, “Nitric oxide neruotoxicity”, J Chem Neuroanat
10:179-190,1996.
20BC
Albenzi, “Models of brain injury and alterations in synaptic neuroplasticity”,
J Neruosci Res 65:279-283,2001.
21WG
Mayhan, “Nitric oxide donor-induced increase in permeability of the
blood-brain barrier”, Brain Res 866:101-108,2000.
22OG
Khatsenko etal., “Nitric oxide is a mediator of the decrease in cytochrome
p450-dependent metabolism caused by immunostimulants”, Proc Nat Acad Sci USA
90:11147-11151,1993.
23GE
Ziem, “Profile of Patients with Chemical Injury and Sensitivity”, Int. J
Toxicol 18:401-409,1999.
24GE
Ziem, Invited presentation: Endocrine changes in Patients with Chronic Illness
Following Chemical Overexposure.